Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v4 Family World Record Benchmarks
World Record Benchmark Performance
The powerful new Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v4 product family offers unparalleled versatility across diverse data center workloads. These processors are designed for architecting next-generation data centers running on software-defined infrastructure and supercharged for efficiency, performance, and agility across cloud-native and traditional applications.
Optimal Workload Performance Meets Intelligent Orchestration for Your Modern Data Center
The Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v4 product family is the right architectural foundation for software-defined enterprise data centers optimized for cloud deployments that require increased scalability, automation, and orchestration capabilities across compute, storage, and network workloads. Built-in features provide preferential allocation of resources based on priority workloads for better utilization overall and enable greater performance across cloud-native and traditional applications while maintaining service level agreements (SLAs). The digital services of tomorrow will require modern, programmable data centers optimized for agility, operational efficiency, and scale on demand. Architect that next-generation foundation today with software-defined infrastructure solutions built on the Intel Xeon processor E5-2600 v4 product family.
- Up to 47% higher generational performance on a financial services option pricing workload
- Up to 28% average performance improvement across a variety of key industry-standard workloads and applications
- Up to 50% average energy efficiency (performance per watt) improvement across a variety of key industry-standard workloads and applications using improved components and newer, higher capacity SSDs
- Support up to 2.4x more VMs/server reducing operational expenses and cost per VM by up to 58% maximizing CSP profitability versus two-generations-old servers (E5 v2) 1
Platform Performance Highlights
Over 35 new world record performance benchmark results with the best Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v4 product family-based platforms (as of November 10, 2016).
| Partner | Platform |
Segment - Benchmark |
Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Cisco UCS* C220 M4 | General Server Speed Computing: SPECint*_base2006 |
2-socket world record |
| Partner | Platform |
Segment - Benchmark |
Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Dell PowerEdge* R730 | Business Processing - Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution* |
2-socket world record (Linux) |
| Partner | Platform |
Segment - Benchmark |
Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 | Business processing ERP/Energy Efficiency: SAP Server Power (2-tier)* |
World Record |
| Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 | Infrastructure/Virtualization: VMmark* 2.5.2 Performance (matched pair) |
2-socket world record | |
| Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 | Infrastructure/Virtualization: VMmark* 2.5.2 Performance with Server Power |
World record |
| Partner | Platform | Segment - Benchmark | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 | Technical Speed Computing: SPECfp*_base2006 |
2-socket x86 world record |
| HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 | Big Data Analytics: TPC Benchmark* H @ 1TB non-clustered |
World record | |
| HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 | Big Data Analytics: TPC Benchmark* Express Big Bench @ 3000 |
World record | |
| HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 |
Server-side Java*: SPECjbb*2015 Distributed Max-jOPS |
World record | |
| HPE Synergy* 480 Gen9 | Server-side Java: SPECjbb*2015 Distributed Critical-jOPS |
World record | |
| HPE Synergy* 480 Gen9 | Server-side Java: SPECjbb*2015 Composite Max-jOPS |
World record | |
| HPE Synergy* 480 Gen9 | Server-side Java: SPECjbb*2015 Composite Critical-jOPS |
World record | |
| HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 |
Server-side Java: SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Max-jOPS |
2-socket world records |
|
| HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 | Server-side Java: SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS |
2-socket world record |
| Partner | Platform | Segment - Benchmark | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Fusion Server* RH2288H V3 | General Server Energy Efficiency: SPECpower_ssj*2008 |
World record |
| Partner | Platform | Segment - Benchmark | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Lenovo* System x3650 M5 | Infrastructure/Virtualization: SPECvirt_sc*2013 |
2-socket world record |
| Lenovo* System x3650 M5 | Infrastructure/Virtualization: SPECvirt_sc*2013_ServerPPW |
2-socket world record | |
| Lenovo* System x3650 M5 | Infrastructure/Virtualization: SPECvirt_sc*2013_PPW |
2-socket world record | |
| Lenovo* System x3650 M5 | Business Processing: TPC Benchmark* E |
2-socket world record |
| Partner | Platform | Segment - Benchmark | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
Oracle Server* X6-2 | Business Processing: SPECjEnterprise*2010 |
2-socket world record |
| Partner | Platform | Segment - Benchmark | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
SGI ICE XA* IP-125 | Technical Computing: SPECmpiM*2007 |
8-,16-,32-, and 40-node 2-socket world records |
| SGI Rackable* C2112-4GP3 | Technical Computing: SPECmpiM*2007 |
1-, 2-, and 4-node 2-socket world records | |
| SGI ICE XA* IP-125 | Technical Computing: SPECmpiL*2007 |
32-, 64- and 128-node 2-socket world records | |
| SGI Rackable* C2112-4GP3 | Technical Computing: SPECmpiL*2007 |
2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-node 2-socket world records |
World Record Configurations
Results and configurations as of November 10, 2016
Cisco:
Claim based on best published two-socket SPECint*_base2006 result submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Cisco UCS* C220 M4 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (22 cores, 44 threads), Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* 7.2, Intel Compiler 16.0, Score: 73.1, source: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/servers-unified-computing/specint-benchmark-disclosure.pdf.
Dell:
Claim based on best published two-socket Two-tier SAP SD* (Linux) with enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 benchmark result submitted to/published at http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Dell PowerEdge* R730 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* Server 7.2 using SAP ASE* 16 scoring 22,222 SD benchmark users. Source: The SAP certification number is 2016050, http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7CC6FD292ABC44C5639F15B34E8F3FF2A0D31369DC5D7517E8.
Fujitsu:
Claim based on best published two-socket VMmark* 2.5.x performance (matched pair) result submitted to/published at https://www.vmware.com/a/vmmark/1/pair/1/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2530 M2 platform with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (22 cores, 44 threads), 512 GB memory, running VMware* ESXi 6.0.0 U2 Build 3620759 and vCenter Server 6.0.0 Build 3018524; Fibre Channel SAN storage. Score: 34.93 @ 28 Tiles, source: http://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2016-07-08-Fujitsu-RX2530M2.pdf.
Claim based on best published two-socket VMmark* 2.5.x performance with server power result submitted to/published at http://www.vmware.com/a/vmmark/2/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 platform with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (22 cores, 44 threads), 512 GB memory, running VMware* ESXi 6.0.0 U1b Build 3380124 and vCenter Server 6.0.0 Build 3018524; Fibre Channel SAN storage. Score: PPKW Score: 38.3065 @ 28 Tiles, source: http://www.vmware.com/a/assets/vmmark/pdf/2016-03-31-Fujitsu-RX2540M2-serverPPKW.pdf.
Claim based on best published two-socket SAP* Server Power 2-tier result published at http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/Power_Benchmark_results.htm as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY RX2540 M2 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.2GHz, 22 cores), 512 GB memory, running Windows Server* 2012 R2 Standard Edition, SQL Server* 2012, SAP* enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0. Score: 4.27 watts/kSAPS. Source: The SAP certification number is 2016005, http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/pdf/Cert2016005.pdf.
HPE:
Claim based on best published two-socket SPECfp*_base2006 result submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2667 v4 (3.2 GHz, 8 cores), with 256 GB (16 x 16 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R) Total Memory on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64), SP1, Kernel 3.12.49-11-default using C/C++: Version 16.0.0.101 of Intel C++ Studio XE, for Linux;, Fortran: Version 16.0.0.101 of Intel Fortran, Studio XE for Linux, Scoring 126. Data Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2016q2/cpu2006-20160531-41726.html, Benchmark: SPECfp*_base2006.
Claim based on best published non-clustered TPC Benchmark* H @ 1TB result submitted to/published at www.tpc.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Microsoft* Windows Server* 2012 R2 Standard Edition using Microsoft SQL Server* 2016 Enterprise Edition scoring 678,492 QphH @ 1TB @ $0.64/QphH @ 1TB available 7/31/16, source: submitted to www.tpc.org/3320.
Claim based on best published TPC Benchmark* Express-BigBench @ 3000 result published at www.tpc.org as of 10 November. New configuration: 9x HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 & 3x DL360 Gen9 servers with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697A v4 for worker nodes on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 6.7 using Cloudera* Enterprise 5.6 scoring 337 BBQpm@3000 @ $1102.94/BBQpm@3000 available 3/31/16, source: submitted to www.tpc.org/3502.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 120674 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS, 39513 SPECjbb2015-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q1/jbb2015-20160315-00054.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 120674 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS, 39615 SPECjbb2015-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: https://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q1/jbb2015-20160315-00055.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 120674 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS, 38570 SPECjbb2015-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q1/jbb2015-20160315-00056.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE Synergy 480 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 64 GB 4Rx4 PC4-2400T-LD, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 67214 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed critical-jOPS, 94667 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00116.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Composite result submitted to/published at http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00116.html as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE Synergy 480 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 32 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 106645 SPECjbb*2015-Composite max-jOPS, 59340 SPECjbb*2015-Composite critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00124.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Composite result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE Synergy 480 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 32 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 scoring 64452 SPECjbb*2015-Composite critical-jOPS, 104194 SPECjbb*2015-Composite max-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00122.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 (2.40GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 scoring 122045 SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Max-jOPS, 29701 SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00119.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 (2.40GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 scoring 122045 SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Max-jOPS, 30318 SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00123.html.
Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 (2.40GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 64 GB 4Rx4 PC4-2400T-L, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 74929 SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS, 97034 SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM Max-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00125.html.
Huawei:
Claim based on best published one-node SPECpower*_ssj2008 results, published at https://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Huawei Technologies Fusion Server RH2288H V3 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2698 v4, 64 GB memory, running Microsoft* Windows Server* 2012 R2 Datacenter, JVM version: Oracle Java HotSpot* 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.80-b11, mixed mode), version 1.7.0_80, Score: 12,212 overall ssj_ops/watt, source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00125.html.
Lenovo:
Claim based on best-published two-socket SPECvirt_sc*2013 results published at https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: 1-Node, 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Lenovo* System x3650 M5 with 512 GB total memory on Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7.2-kernel 3.10.0-327. Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2016q3/virt_sc2013-20160823-00060-perf.html, Score: 2360 @ 137 VMs.
Claim based on best-published two-socket SPECvirt_sc*2013_ServerPPW results published at https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: 1-Node, 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Lenovo* System x3650 M5 with 512 GB total memory on Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7.2-kernel 3.10.0-327, using Yokogawa, Ltd WT310 power analyzer. Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2016q2/virt_sc2013-20160419-00049-ppws.html, Score: 4.196 @ 132 VMs.
Claim based on best-published two-socket SPECvirt_sc*2013_PPW results published at https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: 1-Node, 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Lenovo* System x3650 M5 with 512 GB total memory on Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7.2-kernel 3.10.0-327, using Yokogawa, Ltd WT310 power analyzer. Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2016q2/virt_sc2013-20160419-00049-ppw.html, Score: 4.196 @ 132 VMs.
Claim based on non-clustered best published two-socket TPC benchmark* E result submitted to/published at https://www.tpc.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Lenovo* System x*3650 M5 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 2.2GHz, (2 processor, 44 cores, 88 threads), 512GB DDR4, running Windows Server* 2012 SE, SQL Server* 2016 Enterprise Edition, 2x 900GB SAS (RAID-1), 4x 800GB SAS SSD (RAID-10), 53x 800GB SAS SSD. Availability: July 31, 2016. Source: www.tpc.org/4076. Score: 4,938.14 tpsE, at a price of $117.91 USD/tpsE.
Oracle:
Claim based on best published two-socket SPECjEnterprise*2010 result submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/jEnterprise2010/results/jEnterprise2010.html as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Oracle WebLogic Server Standard Edition Release 12.2.1 on Oracle Server* X6-2 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Oracle* Linux 6 Update 7 x86_64 using Oracle Java HotSpot* 64-Bit Server VM, version 1.8.0_91 scoring 27,803 EjOPS, source: https://www.spec.org/jEnterprise2010/results/res2016q1/jEnterprise2010-20160622-00061.html.
SGI:
Claim based on best 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 32-, 64-, and 128-node two-socket SPECmpiL*2007 benchmark results submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results as of 10 November 2016. New configurations: SGI Rackable C2112-4GP3 with 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-node or SGI ICE XA servers with 32-, 64-, and 128-node 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-269x v4 using Intel Compiler 16, source: http://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results/.
Claim based on best 1, 2, 4, 8, 16-, 32-, and 40-node two-socket SPECmpiM*2007 benchmark results submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results as of 10 November 2016. New configurations: SGI Rackable C2112-4GP3 server with 1-, 2-, and 4-node 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 or SGI ICE XA server with 8-, 16-, 32-, and 40-node 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2690 v4 using Intel® Compiler 16, source: http://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results/.
Additional information: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Información sobre productos y desempeño
(E5 v4 hasta 2.4 veces más de VM/server frente al desempeño de E5 v2 a un costo 58 % más bajo por máquina virtual según la carga de trabajo de consolidación de la infraestructura de virtualización de SPECvirt_sc*2013 entregada/publicada en https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/ con fecha 16 de marzo de 2016) en comparación con 2 procesadores Intel® Xeon® E5-2697 v2 de 1 nodo en Sistema de IBM x*3650 M4* con 512 GB de memoria total en Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 6.4. Fuente de datos: https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2013q3/virt_sc2013-20130820-00004-perf.html, puntuación: 947 en 53 máquinas virtuales frente a 2 procesadores Intel® Xeon® E5-2699 v4 de 1 nodo en Sistema de Lenovo x*3650 M5* con 512 GB de memoria total en Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7. Fuente de datos: publicada en www.spec.org, puntuación: 2325 en 132 máquinas virtuales, mientras más alto, mejor. Análisis de TCO de cuatro años para un costo 58 % menor por máquina virtual con los mismos detalles de nivel de desempeño/VM totales:
i. Mantenimiento del servidor ($2399/servidor) = $95 960
ii Energía y enfriamiento ($0.10/KwH a 60 % de utilización de la CPU) = $21 837
iii. Espacio de bastidor/planta ($155/servidor) = $6200
iv. Redes ($15/servidor) = $600
b. 25 estimaciones existentes del procesador Intel® Xeon® E5-2697 v2 de 2 zócalos (costo total de 4 años de $298 247 que respalda 1325 máquinas virtuales a $225.09/VM)
i. Mantenimiento del servidor ($2399/servidor) = $239,900
ii Energía y enfriamiento ($0.10/KwH a 60 % de utilización de la CPU) = $41 347
iii. Espacio de bastidor/planta ($155/servidor) = $15,500
iv. Redes ($15/servidor) = $1500 [SRA1]
Se obtuvieron resultados de análisis de desempeño antes de la implementación de los recientes parches de software y las actualizaciones de software pretenden abordar amenazas llamadas "Spectre" y "Meltdown". Es posible que la implementación de estas actualizaciones transforme estos resultados en inaplicables para su dispositivo o sistema.
Es posible que las cargas de trabajo y el software utilizados en las pruebas de desempeño se hayan optimizado en términos de desempeño solo en microprocesadores Intel®. Las pruebas de desempeño, como SYSmark* y MobileMark*, se miden utilizando sistemas específicos de computación, componentes, software, operaciones y funciones. Cualquier cambio en alguno de esos factores podría generar un cambio en los resultados. Debe consultar otra información y pruebas de desempeño que lo ayuden a evaluar plenamente las compras consideradas, incluido el desempeño de ese producto cuando se combina con otros. Para obtener más información, visite http://www.intel.la/benchmarks.
Intel no ejerce control ni inspección sobre el diseño o la implementación de los valores de referencia o sitios web de terceros a los que se hace referencia en este documento. Intel recomienda a todos sus clientes visitar los sitios web a los que se hace referencia u otros donde se publiquen referencias de desempeño similares y confirmar si las referencias citadas son precisas y reflejan el desempeño de los sistemas disponibles para la compra.
Relative performance is calculated by assigning a baseline value of 1.0 to one benchmark result, and then dividing the actual benchmark result for the baseline platform into each of the specific benchmark results of each of the other platforms, and assigning them a relative performance number that correlates with the performance improvements reported.
Las características y los beneficios de las tecnologías Intel® dependen de la configuración del sistema y podrían requerir hardware y software habilitados o la activación del servicio. El desempeño varía en función de la configuración del sistema. Ningún sistema informático puede proporcionar una seguridad absoluta. Consulte a su proveedor de software, fabricante de sistemas o distribuidor minorista, u obtenga más información en http://www.intel.com/software/tsx.
SPEC*y el análisis de las referencias SPECint*, SPECfp*, SPECjbb*, SPECjEnterprise*, SPECvirt_sc*, SPECpower_ssj*, SPECompM*y SPECompL*, son marcas comerciales de Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
TPC Benchmark, TPC-C, tpmC, TPC-H, QphH, TPC-E y tpsE son marcas comerciales de Transaction Processing Council. Consulte www.tpc.org para obtener más información.
SAP and SAP NetWeaver are the registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several other countries. See www.sap.com/benchmark for more information.
VMware es una marca comercial registrada y VMmark es una marca comercial de VMware, Inc.
Los procesadores Intel® con el mismo SKU pueden variar en frecuencia o potencia como el resultado de la variabilidad natural en el proceso de producción.